Recognizing and Evaluating the Ruling Dimension in Collective Housing after the Islamic Revolution in Tehran, with a Look at the Discourses that Emerged in each Government

Abstract

After the glorious Islamic revolution, there were unique and diverse discourses to solve existing problems and shortcomings, and each of these discourses have manifested themselves in collective housing in these periods. This research uses a combined method to achieve this How those discourses have appeared in collective housing in each government and to what extent each of them had a contribution in the field of collective housing by using nest by nest method by examining the views of collective housing designers (etic) and by interviewing and extracting indicators and the views of users. The spatial (emic) has been done with a questionnaire. This research has a qualitative and quantitative approach and for the interview and the output of the cascade software from the Atlasti software and the quantitative software used in this research is NCSS, in which factor analysis is done in the Varimax method. The results show that in the physical dimensions of the national housing variable with a value of (0.974), the highest influence is related to the assignment of land in less developed areas with a value of (0.974) and in the spatial dimension, the increase of interactive space with a value of (945.0) 0) and the lowest standard revival is necessary to minimize the construction time (0.561). In the social dimension, studies on failed collective housing (0.814) have the most impact and the standardization of collective housing (414) has the least impact. In the economic dimensions, the highest growth in liquidity and the increase in the ratio of materials (0.811) and the least support for the housing of the former (0.325), in the cultural dimension, the presence of unpleasant odors in the open space (0.223), the least and the most related to the training of the workforce Maher is (0.691). In service-climate, the use of contextual architecture (0.491) and attention to the basics of sustainability in design and implementation (0.161) are the most and the least.